On the whole, the probing of the sociology of education proved that there are a wide array of political actors and groups who are accountable for the shaping of education from the microcosm to the macrocosm level of schooling. In this regard, the paper had truly gone beyond the four walls of classroom. It had defined the nature of schooling in relation to its purpose and role in the society and to its structure of authority. The political dynamics present in education, which are often ignored, characterized by conflicting ideological positions, power struggles as well as the exploitative nature of the globalization trend was also delineated. Pedagogical implications which may be general yet true in specific ways had also been explained. However, a more in-depth analysis and study of the far-reaching implications of the implementation of such policies is recommended to further demarcate and to better understand the far-reaching implications of neoliberal policies on educational practice upon implementation. Also, the need for educational responses in the face of such pressures be defined to convey the stand of the public sector concerning the regulation of pedagogical measures by market mechanisms and capitalists forces, whether educational institutions be subjected to policies which embody no government intervention. These educational responses are expected to emanate from the teacher unions, social movements and critical intellectuals, as what Burbules and Torres (2000) asserted.
On the one hand, the paper seeks to remind once again the readers that in the course of the sociology of education, one must always analyze education and schooling objectively and critically- that is, always looking at the who's, the how's and the why's of every concept that molds education as it is for education is not a mere compilation of paper works or exams but, just like in Freire's view, education is:
总体上，对教育社会学证明有一个广泛的政治行为者和团体负责塑造教育从微观到宏观层面上探讨教育。在这方面，本文确实超越了课堂的四道墙。它界定了学校教育的性质，它的目的和作用，在社会和其结构的权威。目前教育中的政治动态，这往往被忽视，其冲突的意识形态立场，权力斗争以及全球化趋势的剥削性质也被圈定。教学的影响，这可能是一般的，但真的在具体的方式也被解释。然而，一个更深入的分析和对政策执行的影响深远的研究建议进一步界定并更好地了解新自由主义政策对教育实践产生了深远的影响在实施。此外，需要教育的回应，在面对这样的压力被定义传达的立场，公共部门的监管措施的市场机制和资本家的力量，教育机构是否受到政策，体现没有政府干预的立场。这些教育的反应，预计来自教师工会、社会运动和批判的知识分子，如Burbules和托雷斯（2000）断言。
