马克思主义者的批评虽然在某些方面是善意和有效的，但在知识、实践和经验层面上通常都是失败的。第一个智力上的失败体现在马克思自己的引用中，上面的引用假设工资-劳动实际上是和奴隶劳动一样的压迫手段。只有当作为工人的无产阶级没有手段或希望在他们所从事的工作或为其工作的组织中获得所有权的时候，这才是正确的。尽管它可能是真正的1859年,他写道,自由资本主义的发展,特别是在美国,一个个人所有制的社会状态,机会无处不在个人承担的股份,他们做的工作,不仅收集劳动的薪水。在马克思看来，工人从奴役中解放出来的唯一途径就是集体拥有生产资料。迄今为止，这种智力模式的有效性，就其尝试的结果而言，一直是一个可悲的失败。
英国政治学论文代写:马克思主义者的批评
While well intentioned and valid in some ways, Marxists critiques generally fail on intellectual, practical, and empirical levels. The first intellectual failure is manifest in Marx’s own quote, above, which presumes that wage-labor is effectively the same means of oppression as slave labor. This is only true if the proletariat serving as the labor have no means or hope of achieving ownership stake in the work that they do or the organizations for whom they do the work. Though it may have been true in 1859 when he wrote it, liberal capitalism has evolved, particularly in the United States, to the state of an individual-ownership society, where opportunities abound for individuals to assume a stake in the work that they do, not merely collect a paycheck for their labor.In Marx’s mind, the only way for workers to free themselves from this slavery was to collectively own the means of production. The efficacy of this intellectual model has thus far been an abject failure in terms of the results when it has been attempted.
