的广播中,中东事件自1970年代以来就得到了全世界的关注。这是由于该地区的动力学与石油价格的上涨,伊朗伊斯兰共和国的崛起,伊朗-伊拉克战争和冲突在黎巴嫩,约旦河西岸和波斯(阿拉伯)海湾区域演员吸引了注意力,世界作为一个整体。几年前MENA地区许多的问题似乎只影响该地区本身。然而,今天的中东正确地视为世界事件的关键,它将被视为在可预见的未来。(安徒生,罗伊,罗伯特·Seibert和乔恩•瓦格纳政治和改变中东冲突的来源和住宿、9日。,我们,培生教育Inc .,2009)。本文旨在利用关键政治问题,塑造了现代中东和北非地区。它还将试图提供一个对这些问题的理解和反思现代中东国际关系。我将致力于讨论该地区的历史背景,美国的形成和冲突的作用。在我的结论,我将试着决定哪些问题上面提到的是最重要的在塑造现代MENA地区。
为了开发一个更好的理解这个地区是如何塑造我们需要创建一个更广泛的美国是如何形成的形象。这些过程的理论分析将有助于发现系统的作用,在中东和北非地区的形成。如果我们以现实主义为例,其重点是安全和权力的最大化,我们看到它对国家统一的演员试图最大化他们的优势在竞争“无政府主义的”系统,推行强权政治。(2005年韩礼德,p.25)。然而,现实主义有其局限性。例如,它忽略了意识形态和信仰体系,国家和社会内部因素减少到最低限度,其注意力经济是不够的。中东的另一个特别重要的一个因素是它认为州际关系是永恒的,复发模式(如上)。然而它可能认为,尽管现实主义可能无法提供足够的发达国家之间的关系,它提供了一个适当的帐户中东国家的国际关系(如上)。尽管如此,面对威权政府,不相信对方,而战争是无处不在的,关注电力和安全可能出现的。根据韩礼德,这将是归类为一个合格的国防。即便如此,批评人士会说,这是最常见的在世界的一些地方,州,和社会,长期以来服从的全球力量结构现实主义最明显的局限性。
英国萨里大学论文代写:广播
Events in the Middle East have been capturing worldwide attention since the 1970s. This was due to the dynamics in the region related to the increases in the petroleum prices, the rise of the Islamic Republic of Iran, the Iran- Iraq war, and conflicts in Lebanon, the West Bank and the Persian (Arabian) Gulf which have attracted the attention of regional actors and the world as a whole. Just a couple of decades earlier the problems of the MENA region to many seemed to be only affecting the region itself. However, today the Middle East is properly regarded as crucial in world events, and it will be regarded as such in the foreseeable future. (Andersen, Roy, Robert Seibert and Jon Wagner, Politics and Change in the Middle East Sources of Conflict and Accommodation, 9th ed., US, Pearson Education Inc., 2009 ). This essay aims to draw upon the key political issues that have shaped the Modern Middle East and North Africa region. It will also seek to provide an understanding of these issues and their reflection on the Modern Middle Eastern international relations. I will aim to discuss the historical background of the region, the formation of the states and the role of the conflicts. In my conclusion I will try to decide which issue of those mentioned above was the most important in shaping the modern MENA region.
In order to develop a better understanding of how this particular region was shaped we need to create a broader image of how the states were formed. Also a theoretical analysis of these processes would be helpful in finding out the role of systems and states in MENA's formation. If we take for example Realism, an approach which focuses on security and the maximisation of power, we see that it treats states as unitary actors seeking to maximise their advantages within a competitive "anarchical", system, pursuing power politics. (Halliday, 2005, p.25). However, Realism has its limitations. For example, it neglects ideology and belief systems, it minimises internal factors to states and societies, and its attention to economics is inadequate. Another a factor of special importance to the Middle East is its view of inter-state relations as marked by timeless, recurrent patterns (Ibid). Nevertheless it may be argued that while Realism may not provide an adequate account of relations between developed states, it does offer an adequate account of the international relations of Middle Eastern states (Ibid). Nonetheless, faced with authoritarian states that do not trust each other, and where war is ever-present, a concern with power and security may appear predominant. According to Halliday, this would be classified as a qualified defence. Even so, critics may argue that it is most common in parts of the world where states, and societies, have been long subordinated to structures of global power that the limits of realism are most evident.
