与伊斯兰世界,欧洲的政治文化是基于民主宪政,因此辩论伊斯兰教在欧洲社会中所扮演的角色并不中心在宪政问题上。中东战争后9/11已经改变了整个西方社会的前景对伊斯兰教和妇女的权利从而受到重大影响。相反的观点,大多数的调查中,在2007年4月,例如一项盖洛普民意调查表明,穆斯林欧洲的世俗性质的社会感到满意。然而,穆斯林在欧洲采取世俗民主规范并不意味着他们将删除伊斯兰原则和法律规定,指导日常生活。后9/11欧洲的穆斯林也强调了欧洲人权概念的问题性质由法国政府认为法律禁止任何宗教的象征,或最新的禁止罩袍的比利时、瑞士公投或限制尖塔的建设。然而,与此同时,最近的趋势表明,由于伊斯兰教法的复杂性女性通常更喜欢欧洲法律,管辖权和更性中性和女人有利。因此这提供了两个不同的法律体系之间的桥接慢,看不见但是肯定适应的穆斯林个人法律与欧洲世俗的法律。近年来,宗教自由的概念已经在新含义由于9/11袭击[37]。一些欧洲国家对争议的身份和宗教象征的律例,寻求促进一般意义上的安全通过限制宗教自由。[38]但很大程度上,需要理解的是,到底是把妇女的权利冲突。
英国雷丁大学论文代写:伊斯兰世界
Unlike the Islamic World, the European Political Culture is based on democratic constitutionalism and therefore the debate on the role of Islam in European societies doesn't centre on constitutionalism issues. The war in the Middle East Post 9/11 has changed the entire outlook of the western community towards the Islam and rights of women have been substantially affected thereby. Contrary to the view, most survey, e.g. a Gallup poll in April 2007, show that Muslims are satisfied with the secular nature of Europe societies. However, the fact that Muslims in Europe adopt secular democratic norms doesn't mean they will remove Islamic principles and legal rules that instruct their daily life. Post 9/11 European Muslims have highlighted the problematic nature of the European conception of Human Rights by arguing laws on the ban by French Government on any religious symbol, or the latest of prohibiting of burqa by Belgium, or the Swiss referendum to limit the construction of minarets. However, at the same time, recent trends show that due to complexities of Shari'a law women usually prefer jurisdiction under European Laws; and it is more sexually neutral and women advantageous. Thus this provides bridging between the two diverse legal systems with slow, invisible but affirmative adaptation of Muslim personal laws with European secular laws. In recent years, the concept of religious freedom has taken on new implication due to 9/11 attack [37] . Some European nations have responded to the controversies of identity and religious symbol with statutes that seek to promote a general sense of safety by limiting religious freedoms. [38] But largely that need to be understood is to where exactly are the conflicts taking the rights of women to.