在过去的十年里，诸如《不让一个孩子掉以继日法》(布什总统，2001年)这样的立法规定了教育标准的问责制和对考试结果的重视。从理论上讲，它将提高所有学生的公共教育质量。支持者认为，该法案的举措将通过制定标准和为学校提供资源，进一步推动美国教育民主化，而不论学校的贫富、种族、残疾或语言。反对该法案的人声称，该法案在改善公共教育，尤其是高中教育方面效果不佳，标准化考试的结果好坏参半。他们还声称，标准化考试存在严重缺陷，存在偏见，原因有很多，更严格的教师资格加剧了全国教师短缺，而没有提供更强大的师资力量。一些批评人士认为，联邦政府在教育领域没有宪法赋予的权力，联邦政府的介入侵蚀了州政府和地方政府对子女教育的控制。除了这些问题，不让一个孩子掉队的行为阻碍了那些比同龄人高一层次的学生。该法案让学校关注那些有落后风险的学生，让那些大步走在阴影中的学生。此外，由于他们对“天才”没有一个普遍的定义，也没有一种实施“天才教育”的标准方式，因此，他们会引导学生走进一间黑暗的房间，期待他们能拿出他们余生所需的一切。《不让一个孩子掉队法》转移了高年级学生的注意力，转而帮助那些只需要最低限度通过考试的高危学生。在大学阶段，学生们与新的学习环境作斗争，他们被迫辍学，因为他们不能上大学，只是坐在教室里，感到困惑和失败。
英国教育学作业代写:不让一个孩子掉队法
Within the last decade, legislation such as the No Child Left Behind Act (President Bush, 2001), was a mandate for accountability on educational standards and emphasis on test results. In theory, it will improve the quality of public education for all students. Supporters believe that the act’s initiatives will further democratize U.S. education, by setting standards and providing resources to schools, regardless of wealth, ethnicity, disabilities or language spoken. Those that oppose it allege that the act hasn’t been effective in improving education in public education, especially high schools, as evidenced by mixed results in standardized tests. They also claim that standardized testing is deeply flawed and biased for many reasons, and that stricter teacher qualifications have exacerbated the nationwide teacher shortage, not provided a stronger teaching force. Some critics believe that the federal government has no constitutional authority in the educational arena, and that federal involvement erodes state and local control over education of their children.In addition to these problems, the No Child Left Behind Act hindered those students who are one level above their peers. The act made schools focus on those who are at risk of fallen behind and leave the students who stride in the shadows. Also, since their is no general definition for the “gifted” nor a standard way of implementing “gifted education, then leads those students walking into a dark room and expecting them to come out with everything they need for the rest of their lives. The No Child Left Behind Act shifted the attention of the higher level students and turned it to facilitating at risk students who only need the bare minimum to pass. At a college level, students combat themselves with a new learning environment and are forced to dropout because they can’t afford to go to college just to sit in a class and be bewildered and fail the class.