总结了以上的这些争论，Singh认识伊莎贝拉和伦敦，因为他是一个殖民地人民已经“流离失所”的身份危机对殖民地的“奴隶岛的一员，“一个种族与文化的混合种群。在Singh时期来到伦敦之前，他犹豫之间，他渴望从岛上逃走，他感觉“流离失所”和“无根”的感觉，并在殖民岛过去的经历但他不知它的高度。Singh的政治生涯中，“辛格和Browne表明“模棱两可的态度，而他们似乎对“殖民”和殖民地，他们的“矛盾态度”实际上表明故障的真正来源批评个人和社会是被发现的“殖民者”。最后，Singh逃离了他的“人工家”到“帝国中心”，声称已经实现，但他的“矛盾态度”再次表明，这些都不是真正的成就，但只是借口被Singh找到了“归属感”在某个“位置”的地球。然而，即使在这种表面上的妥协，Singh让他的重要语句，最后将他自己的文化，没有一个的殖民者。
英国大曼彻斯特论文代写:总结争论
To summarise what has been argued above, Singh is disillusioned about both Isabella and London, because he is a member of a colonised people that has been “displaced” identity crisis on a colonial “slave-island,” with a racially and culturally mixed population. In the period before Singh comes to London, he vacillates between his longing to escape from the island, where he feels “displaced” and “rootless”, and the feeling that experience past on the colonial island nevertheless attaches him somehow to it. During Singh’s political career, the “ambivalent attitudes” in Singh and Browne have shown that, while they seem to criticise the “colonised” and the colony, their “ambivalent attitude” actually indicates that the real source of the faults criticised in individuals and the society is to be found with the “coloniser”. Finally, Singh escapes from his “artificial home” to the “imperial centre” and claims to have found fulfilment there, but his “ambivalent attitude” again shows that these are not real fulfilments, but only excuses used by Singh to find a “sense of attachment” in a certain “location” of the earth. However, even during this seeming compromise, Singh makes his important statement that finally attaches him to his own culture and not to the one of the coloniser.