除了这个,是社会工作的专业理论知识给(豪,2009)。汤普森(2010)认为,其他专业人员和服务用户将更有信心在一个社会工作者能够证明他们的工作是基于一个理论框架,从而展示技能,理解和意义服务的用户情况,推测而不是人。沃克说,“重要的是,社会工作者了解人类发展与其他学科和工作有效地展示专业素养与他们地位相称的”(2010年,pp.xiv-xv)。一个例子是一个社会工作者在社区精神卫生工作团队与精神科医生和社区精神科护士倡导医学模式和“强调诊断和治疗”(p.10帕里什,2010年)。在此设置工作并不意味着社会工作者需要忽略心理的角度来看。倡导服务用户有效,社会工作者需要了解医疗和心理视角,就像帕里什州”要求[s]专业相当于“双语”的同时能够理解视角”(p.10帕里什,2010年)。
的1992年,欣德马什研究社会工作毕业生,表明理论的理解并为毕业生提供了信心。认为,然而,欣德马什这种信心没有继续在实践中毕业生认为使用理论作为一种工具来证明他们的行动或提供问责管理(佩恩,2005)。汤普森认为专业社会工作者的影响,被他描述为“管理主义”(2010年,p.51)。汤普森解释说,政府的预算通过性能指标的策略是推动地方政府达到目标。这是过滤管理结构,因此,中层管理者是决定什么是需要,应该由社会工作者实现,以达到目标。尽管社会工作者致力于理论在实践的使用,管理主义导致了他们缺乏专业的信心”(2010 p.51)。
加拿大多伦多大学论文代写:专业理论
Alongside this, is the professionalism a theoretical knowledge gives to social work (Howe, 2009). Thompson (2010) argues that other professionals and service users will be more confident in a social worker who is able to demonstrate that their work is based on a theoretical framework, thus showing skills to comprehend and make sense of the service users situation, rather than one who conjectures. Walker states, "it is important that social workers have an understanding of human development to work effectively with other disciplines and to demonstrate a professional literacy commensurate with their status" (2010, pp.xiv-xv). An example of this is a social worker working within a Community Mental Health Team alongside Psychiatrists and Community Psychiatric Nurses who advocate the medical model and "its emphasis on diagnostics and cures' (Parrish, 2010 p.10). Working in this setting does not mean that the social worker needs to ignore a psychosocial perspective. To advocate for service users effectively, the social worker needs to understand both the medical and psychosocial perspectives, as Parrish states it "necessitate[s] the professional equivalent of being 'bilingual' in being able to understand both perspectives simultaneously" (Parrish, 2010 p.10).
In 1992, Hindmarsh's research on social work graduates, showed that an understanding of theory did provide the graduates with confidence. However, Hindmarsh argued that this confidence did not continue in practice as graduates viewed the use of theory as just a tool to justify their actions or provide accountability to their management (Payne, 2005a). Thompson argues that the professionalism of the social worker is being impacted on by what he describes as 'managerialism' (2010, p.51). Thompson explains that government's budgeting tactics through 'performance indicators' is pushing local government to meet targets. This is filtered down the management structure, so that middle managers are dictating what is required and should be implemented by social workers, in order to achieve the targets. Although social workers are dedicated to the use of theory in their practice, managerialism has led to them lacking 'professional confidence' (2010 p.51).
