苏格拉底最基本的原则，真正重要的不是活着而是好好活着。因此，他认为，从道义上讲，向警卫支付报酬并逃跑是正确的。他开始通过考虑城市的后果来解决这个问题。他说，如果他逃跑的话，法律和城市就会被摧毁。如果没有公民的遵守，法律判决可能会失去效力，一个没有法律的城市不会长久保持完整。苏格拉底也认为，如果他逃跑，会伤害他的灵魂。他认为他的灵魂会受到伤害因为他认为通过伤害这座城市他也会伤害他的灵魂。对别人的伤害负责是对自己灵魂造成伤害的事情。他也会因为违背了协议而遭受灵魂的伤害。他心照不宣地同意遵守雅典的法律，因为他在雅典的统治下生活了70年，他的孩子在雅典的统治下长大，并且没有试图说服雅典改变他们。苏格拉底自己指出，这是一个错误的假设。他说，克里托忽略了他的朋友们愿意也有能力抚养他的孩子的可能性。如果他要逃走，他不认为在那里抚养他们对他的孩子最有利，因为在那里他们会被认为是外国人。如果他逃跑了，他会让他的朋友照顾他在雅典的孩子，如果他逃跑了，他们没有理由照顾他们，但如果他死了，他们没有理由。
澳洲留学生论文代写:苏格拉底
Socrates’ most fundamental principles that the really important thing is not to live but to live well. Therefore, he considers whether it is morally right to pay off the guards and escape. He begins addressing this issue by considering the consequences for the city. He says that the laws and the city could be destroyed if he escaped. Legal judgments could lose their force if they were not abided by private citizens, and a city without laws would not remain intact for very long. Socrates also thought he would be harming the condition of his soul by escaping. He thought his soul would be harmed because he assumed that by harming the city he would be also harming his soul. Being responsible for harm to others is something that causes harm to one’s soul. He also would have suffered harm to his soul because he broke an agreement. He made a tacit agreement to follow the laws of Athens because he lived under them for seventy years, raised his children under them, and did not try to persuade the city to change them.Socrates himself points out that this is an incorrect assumption. He says that Crito overlooks the possibility that his friends would be both willing and capable of bringing his children up. If he were to escape, he does not think it would be in his children’s best interest to raise them there, because there they would be considered foreigners. If he escaped he would ask his friends to take care of his children in Athens, and there is no reason why they should take care of them if he escapes but not if he dies.
