言论是一种沟通的手段，是信息和八卦自由流动的高速公路，但就像交通的路障一样，来自国家的干预可能被视为不方便，或者是一种不合理的限制。《世界人权宣言》对言论自由的定义是“每个人都有发表意见和言论自由的权利;这一权利包括不受干涉地持有意见的自由，以及通过任何媒介和不分国界地寻求、接受和传播信息和思想的自由。2)·沃巴顿(”(Warbuton)。言论自由的权利保护了一个人表达意见和观点的能力，无论这些意见和观点多么有争议或容易出错，而不受国家无理干涉。虽然言论自由权是基本人权的基本要素，但有一些因素可以证明政府干预、审查和管制是正当的。这些理由包括密尔的损害原则、法律道德主义和损害检验。
英国教育学essay代写:言论沟通
Speech is a means to communication, a free-flowing highway of information and gossip, but like a roadblock for traffic, interference from the state could be seen as inconvenient, or an unjustifiable limitation. Free speech, as defined by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, is “Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.” (Warbuton,2). The right to free speech protects a person’s ability to express their opinions and views, no matter how controversial or fallible they are, without unjustified interference from the state. Although the right to free speech is rudimentary to basic human rights, there are factors that would justify government interference, censorship and regulation. These justifications include Mill’s harm principle, legal moralism, and the harm test.
