选择的另一篇文章是以客观的观点写的，阐述了唯一业主的奋斗性质，他们如何长期为他们的工人提供足够的健康保险，但却无法做到这一点，因为它不是免税的。在所有引用的出版物中也使用了一些相关的事实和统计数字，以探讨这一问题的影响并评估其影响。这些文章确实提供了一些定量的统计依据，在此基础上得出了一些结论。同时，对手的研究大多是定性的。为了限制纯粹使用定性方法的局限性，我们必须尽可能地利用数量部分。虽然现有的资源不能一次性解决问题，但所有作者对保险部门和小企业的密切关系，承诺从定性和定量两方面提供一些有价值的见解。
英国邓迪论文代写:客观的观点
The other article chosen was written in an objective point of view, stating the struggling nature of sole-proprietors, how they long to provide adequate health insurance for their workers but cannot manage to do so since it is not tax deductible. Some pertinent facts and statistics are also utilized in all of the cited publications in order to explore the effects of this issue and evaluate their implications. These articles do provide some quantitative statistical grounding, based on which some conclusions can be drawn. At the same time, most of the research on hand will be qualitative. In order to curb the limitations inherent to using the qualitative method exclusively, we must utilize the quantitative part as much as these resources allow. While the resources available won't solve the problem once and for all, the closeness of all the writers to both the insurance sector and to the small businesses promises to provide some valuable insight on the issue, from a both qualitative and quantitative approach.
